diff options
| author | Nikhita Raghunath <nikitaraghunath@gmail.com> | 2019-02-03 18:12:38 +0530 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Nikhita Raghunath <nikitaraghunath@gmail.com> | 2019-02-08 19:14:00 +0530 |
| commit | 8b65a66aa7c5c6bfe75a485fe98f0d7a255039ce (patch) | |
| tree | 9197958fbf9eac264a3366e8f3e20b244afe8b5b /contributors | |
| parent | 2717f63fa6b196bcafeba27bc355947b18aa6d3b (diff) | |
Update CoC links to the Kubernetes CoC instead of the CNCF CoC
Diffstat (limited to 'contributors')
| -rw-r--r-- | contributors/guide/README.md | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/contributors/guide/README.md b/contributors/guide/README.md index c0d8ac86..82f16556 100644 --- a/contributors/guide/README.md +++ b/contributors/guide/README.md @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Before you can contribute, you will need to sign the [Contributor License Agreem ## Code of Conduct -Please make sure to read and observe our [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/code-of-conduct.md). +Please make sure to read and observe our [Code of Conduct](/code-of-conduct.md). ## Setting up your development environment @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ To make it easier for your PR to receive reviews, consider the reviewers will ne * break large changes into a logical series of smaller patches which individually make easily understandable changes, and in aggregate solve a broader issue * label PRs with appropriate SIGs and reviewers: to do this read the messages the bot sends you to guide you through the PR process -Reviewers, the people giving the review, are highly encouraged to revisit the [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/code-of-conduct.md) and must go above and beyond to promote a collaborative, respectful community. +Reviewers, the people giving the review, are highly encouraged to revisit the [Code of Conduct](/code-of-conduct.md) and must go above and beyond to promote a collaborative, respectful community. When reviewing PRs from others [The Gentle Art of Patch Review](http://sage.thesharps.us/2014/09/01/the-gentle-art-of-patch-review/) suggests an iterative series of focuses which is designed to lead new contributors to positive collaboration without inundating them initially with nuances: * Is the idea behind the contribution sound? |