summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/committee-steering/governance
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authork8s-ci-robot <k8s-ci-robot@users.noreply.github.com>2018-11-19 14:41:35 -0800
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2018-11-19 14:41:35 -0800
commit346b0da91912f8121e2d8ffc3075301c1f7a52dd (patch)
tree75fdc3f900679885e4de3da8c05e658d45e1ba8b /committee-steering/governance
parent37124da09afc8e7899d7a6e086490835bc401805 (diff)
parentbdc23179ac30badfe6c25f68afe58fad90ccafbe (diff)
Merge pull request #2814 from pwittrock/wg-formation
Follow on working group gov
Diffstat (limited to 'committee-steering/governance')
-rw-r--r--committee-steering/governance/wg-governance.md28
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/committee-steering/governance/wg-governance.md b/committee-steering/governance/wg-governance.md
index 63c450b1..d974f9be 100644
--- a/committee-steering/governance/wg-governance.md
+++ b/committee-steering/governance/wg-governance.md
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
# Kubernetes Working Group Formation and Disbandment
-Draft 1.0 // Jaice Singer DuMars // June, 2018
-
## Process Overview and Motivations
Working Groups provide a formal avenue for disparate groups to collaborate around a common problem, craft a balanced
position, and disband. Because they represent the interests of multiple groups, they are a vehicle for consensus
@@ -25,6 +23,27 @@ over its formation and disbanding.
- Documenting other governance bodies such as sub-projects or SIGs
- Changing the status of existing Working Groups/SIGs/Sub-projects
+## Working Group Relationship To SIGs
+Assets owned by the Kubernetes project (e.g. code, docs, blogs, processes, etc) are owned and
+managed by [SIGs](sig-governance.md). The exception to this is specific assets that may be owned
+by Working Groups, as outlined below.
+
+Working Groups provide structure for governance and communication channels, and as such may
+own the following types of assets:
+
+- Calendar Events
+- Slack Channels
+- Discussion Forum Groups
+
+Working Groups are distinct from SIGs in that they are intend to:
+
+- facilitate collaboration across SIGs
+- facilitate an exploration of a problem / solution through a group with minimal governmental overhead
+
+Working Groups will typically have stake holders whose participation is in the
+context of one or more SIGs. These SIGs should be documented as stake holders of the Working Group
+(see Creation Process).
+
## Is it a Working Group? Yes, if...
- It does not own any code
- It has a clear goal measured through a specific deliverable or deliverables
@@ -62,8 +81,7 @@ requirements for that are:
- chair information
- meeting information
- contact methods
-- any sig stakeholders
-- any subproject stakeholders
+- any [sig](sig-governance.md) stakeholders
The pull request should be labeled with any SIG stakeholders and committee/steering. And since GitHub notifications
are not a reliable means to contact people, an email should be sent to the mailing lists for the stakeholder SIGs,
@@ -92,7 +110,7 @@ Working Groups will be disbanded if either of the following is true:
- Zoom
The current Chair may step down at any time. When they do so, a new Chair may be selected through lazy consensus
-within the Working Group.
+within the Working Group, and [sigs.yaml](/sigs.yaml) should be updated.
References