Creates template for a KEP

1 files changed, 244 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/contributors/design-proposals/kep-template.md b/contributors/design-proposals/kep-template.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2f9c3c81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/contributors/design-proposals/kep-template.md
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
+# KEP Template
+
+## Metadata
+
+## Table of Contents
+
+- [KEP Template](#kep-template)
+   - [Metadata](#metadata)
+   - [Summary](#summary)
+   - [Motivation](#motivation)
+   - [Examples](#examples)
+   - [Detailed Design](#detailed-design)
+   - [How Do I Teach This?](#how-do-i-teach-this)
+      - [KEP Template](#kep-template-1)
+      - [Section: Metadata](#section-metadata)
+      - [Section: Table of contents](#section-table-of-contents)
+      - [Section: Summary](#section-summary)
+      - [Section: Motivation](#section-motivation)
+      - [Section: Examples](#section-examples)
+      - [Section: How Do I Teach This?](#section-how-do-i-teach-this)
+      - [Section: Detailed Design](#section-detailed-design)
+      - [Section: Graduation Criteria](#section-graduation-criteria)
+      - [Section: Implementation History](#section-implementation-history)
+      - [Section: Drawbacks](#section-drawbacks)
+      - [Section: Alternatives](#section-alternatives)
+      - [Section: Unresolved Questions](#section-unresolved-questions)
+      - [Section: Mentors](#section-mentors)
+   - [Graduation Criteria](#graduation-criteria)
+   - [Drawbacks](#drawbacks)
+   - [Alternatives](#alternatives)
+   - [Unresolved Questions](#unresolved-questions)
+   - [Mentors](#mentors)
+
+## Summary
+
+The KEP template combines our design proposals with functionality currently
+provided by the [features repo][] within a flat file in source control. SIGs
+will adopt and fork the KEP template to support their specific needs.
+
+[features repo]: https://github.com/kubernetes/features
+
+## Motivation
+
+A template for a unit of work described in a [proposal to standardize][] the
+Kubernetes development process is provided.
+
+[proposal to standardize]: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/967
+
+## Examples
+
+- [this KEP][]
+- [the KEP process][]
+
+[this KEP]: https://github.com/calebamiles/community/blob/propose-kep-template/contributors/design-proposals/kep-template.md
+[the KEP process]: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/967
+
+## Detailed Design
+
+## How Do I Teach This?
+
+[The KEP process][] proposal will outline how a KEP is expected to progress
+from conception to implementation in one or more pull requests to a Kubernetes
+repository. This suggests that a KEP template should be used to track work
+which ultimately will result in change to source control; if you find success
+in modifying the KEP template please notify the [mentors](#mentors)!
+
+### KEP Template
+
+In order to implement an KEP like process the following template will be created
+
+```
+# Title
+## Metadata
+## Table of Contents
+## Summary
+## Motivation
+## Examples [optional]
+## How Do I Teach This? [optional]
+## Detailed Design
+## Graduation Criteria
+## Implementation History
+## Drawbacks [optional]
+## Alternatives [optional]
+## Unresolved Questions [optional]
+## Mentors [optional]
+```
+
+where sections marked `[optional]` may be omitted by KEP authors. It is expected
+that most KEPs will begin their lives in discussion with the responsible SIGs,
+preferably in a mailing list so that the discussion is saved for future Kubernauts.
+
+
+### Section: Metadata
+
+The `Metadata` section is intended to support the creation of tooling around the
+KEP process. The precise format for `Metadata` is described in the
+[metadata proposal][].
+
+[metadata proposal]: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ynmBMuDuT7yGzRscObB1KtgJj8ljYq0I5q4oshrJUCs/edit#
+
+### Section: Table of contents
+
+A table of contents is helpful for quickly jumping to sections of a KEP and for
+highlighting any addtional information provided beyond the standard KEP
+template. [Tools for generating][] a table of contents from markdown are
+available.
+
+[Tools for generating]: https://github.com/ekalinin/github-markdown-toc
+
+
+### Section: Summary
+
+The `Summary` section is incredibly important for producing high quality user
+focused documentation such as release notes or a development road map. It should
+be possible to collect this information before implementation begins in order
+to avoid requiring implementors to split their attention between writing
+release notes and implementing the feature itself. KEP editors, SIG Docs, and
+SIG PM should help to ensure that the tone and content of the `Summary` section
+is useful for a wide audience.
+
+### Section: Motivation
+
+The `Motivation` section should describe
+
+- why we believe this change is important
+- what benefits are expected to be realized from the change
+- the high level design goals
+
+The `Motivation` section is important for getting all responsible parties to
+understand the intention behind a change. The motivation section can optionally
+provide links to [experience reports][] to demonstrate the interest in a KEP
+within the wider Kubernetes community.
+
+[experience reports]: https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/ExperienceReports
+
+### Section: Examples
+
+The `Examples` section should describe the intended user experience for an
+KEP.
+
+### Section: How Do I Teach This?
+
+### Section: Detailed Design
+
+The `Detailed Design` section should contain enough information for someone
+besides the author to begin working on an implementation of the KEP. In a
+similar manner to the guidance on [implementing an RFC][] from the Rust
+community, not all KEPs must be implemented immediately. A high quality
+`Detailed Design` section will enable any interested contributor to begin
+implementation. Associating each KEP with one or more issues filed against
+Kubernetes repositories will allow interested community members to track
+implementation.
+
+[implementing an RFC]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/README.md#implementing-an-rfc
+
+### Section: Graduation Criteria
+
+Software development provides a unique opportunity for an iterative approach to
+value delivery. Gathering user feedback is crucial for building high quality
+experiences and SIGs have the important responsibility of setting milestones
+for stability and feature completeness. Hopefully the content previously
+contained in [umbrella issues][] will be tracked in the `Graduation Criteria`
+section.
+
+[umbrella issues]: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/42752
+
+### Section: Implementation History
+
+Major milestones in the life cycle of a KEP should be tracked in
+`Implementation History`. Major milestones might include
+
+- the `Summary` and `Motivation` sections being merged signaling SIG acceptance
+- the `Detailed Design` section being merged signaling agreement on a proposed
+  design
+- the date implementation started
+- the first Kubernetes release where an initial version of the KEP was available
+- the version of Kubneretes where the KEP graduated to general availability
+- when the KEP was retired or superseded
+
+### Section: Drawbacks
+
+Making trade offs is one of the fundamental tasks of software development. The
+`Drawbacks` section is to record what explicit choices have been made in the
+design for a KEP.
+
+### Section: Alternatives
+
+Similar to the `Drawbacks` section the `Alternatives` section is used to
+highlight and record other possible approaches to delivering the value proposed
+by a KEP.
+
+### Section: Unresolved Questions
+
+The `Unresolved Questions` section is used to parking lot issues not ready to be
+addressed before implementation begins.
+
+### Section: Mentors
+
+Mentors who can help a community member implement a KEP which follows its
+`Detailed Design` are crucial to scaling the Kubernetes project. Potential
+mentors can list their contact information using their preferred contact
+information in the `Mentors` section.
+
+## Graduation Criteria
+
+The first revision of the KEP template will be considered stable once
+
+- SIGs adopt the KEP process and template or fork the template
+- the KEP process has been used for at least two Kubernetes releases
+
+## Drawbacks
+
+- having many possible sections in a KEP may feel too much like the waterfall
+  approach to software development
+
+## Alternatives
+
+The KEP template is similar to the API proposal [design template][] but is
+slightly more general given that it targets the subset of information likely
+required for any significant change. Additionally
+
+- The `Overview subsequent versions` has been replaced with the
+  `Graduation Criteria` section of a KEP. It is intended that graduation
+  criteria are added incrementally as a KEP is implemented and stabilized
+- The `Motivation` and `Use Cases` sections have been collapsed within
+  the `Motivation` section of a KEP. It is expected that experience reports
+  will be the primary description of use cases
+- `Requirements` is replaced by `Detailed Design` within a KEP
+
+[design template]: https://github.com/pwittrock/community/blob/design/contributors/design-proposals/api-proposal-design-template.md
+
+## Unresolved Questions
+
+- How precisely merging portions of a KEP relate to the states of a KEP
+- Formal mechanism for adopting the KEP process and template
+- Automation
+
+## Mentors
+
+- caleb miles
+  - github: [calebamiles](https://github.com/calebamiles/)
+  - slack: [calebamiles](https://coreos.slack.com/team/caleb.miles)
+  - email: [caleb.miles@coreos.com](mailto:caleb.miles@coreos.com)
+  - pronoun: "he"