diff options
| author | nyener <nilaycoskun4155@gmail.com> | 2017-06-20 21:51:38 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | nyener <nilaycoskun4155@gmail.com> | 2017-06-20 21:51:38 -0700 |
| commit | d9d90fb97c60f492ad82a3ed2607b7ceb24ea0fb (patch) | |
| tree | ef89662e1fd16eecfe47e370e431500e79e28706 | |
| parent | 2424f825e58297bcb392814b8570e173589847c2 (diff) | |
Session Notes
2017 Leadership Summit session notes
| -rw-r--r-- | community/2017-events/05-leadership-summit/session-notes/1600-1740_PRESENTATIONS_FROM_BREAKOUTS_AND_CALL_TO_ACTIONS.md | 139 |
1 files changed, 139 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/community/2017-events/05-leadership-summit/session-notes/1600-1740_PRESENTATIONS_FROM_BREAKOUTS_AND_CALL_TO_ACTIONS.md b/community/2017-events/05-leadership-summit/session-notes/1600-1740_PRESENTATIONS_FROM_BREAKOUTS_AND_CALL_TO_ACTIONS.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..024f0ed2 --- /dev/null +++ b/community/2017-events/05-leadership-summit/session-notes/1600-1740_PRESENTATIONS_FROM_BREAKOUTS_AND_CALL_TO_ACTIONS.md @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +Presentations From Breakouts with Call to Actions +================================================= + +Identify the following before beginning your session. Do not move +forward until these are decided / assigned: + +- **Session Topic**: Presentations From Breakouts with Call to Actions +- **Topic Facilitator(s)**: snovotny@ +- **Note-taker(s) (Collaborating on this doc)**: Jason Singer DuMars, + Nilay Yener +- **Person responsible for converting to Markdown & uploading to + Github:** nyener@ + +### Session Notes + +#### SIG GOVERNANCE AND SIG CHECK IN + +- Discussed cross cutting SIG concerns and how to accomplish +- Create certificate for SIGs +- SIG Leads office hours +- SIG Leads mailing list \~ open vs. closed -- read-only +- Private comms will happen in committees + +#### IDENTIFYING AREAS THAT ARE FALLING THROUGH THE CRACKS + +Focused a lot on other contributions that are getting lost: + +- want to help other people and companies take part in non-coding + activities +- How do we call out other contributions +- Incentives for other contributions +- SIGs need to harness the value in Kubernetes +- SIGs might have different roles, i.e. docs, etc. +- Identify and fill roles +- No unfunded mandates, calling out companies that contribute +- Recognize companies that contribute maintenance +- Credits for the release +- Incentivise individuals as well +- Need to be cognizant of company marketing around Kubernetes +- By recognizing roles, you can provide continuity and pride, e.g. + k8sbot +- Conformance working group +- We need to defend the trademark or lose it +- We need to identify repositories that use the kubernetes- taxonomy +- Develop a better way to assess contributions, leaderboard issue (see + action item) + +#### CODE ORGANIZATION + IMPROVING THE RELEASE PROCESS + +- Brian's presentation on why we wanted to break out the repos +- Accepting limitations in GitHub +- Service catalog is already doing this +- Near term direction untangling dependencies +- How are we executing with kubectl +- Integration and testing across different repos is hard +- SIGs involved are API Machinery, CLI and Cluster Lifecycle +- Need a working group to sort out the approach + +#### BUILDING COMMUNITY EFFECTIVENESS + +- Talked about how to get more engagement in meetings +- introductions +- pair mentors +- find out what people want to do +- don't put mission critical work on new contribs +- watch time zones +- keep SIG meeting as status, focus on 1:1 for work +- off-weeks for office hours +- User on-boarding SIG +- education +- 1:1s +- welcome wagon +- Cluster Ops working on this for operators + +#### What went well? + +- Breakouts +- Networking time +- Face to face talking +- More content - more breaks +- Continued note taking and making things available. Templates are + really helpful +- 3 SIGs had a cross SIG collaboration +- Morning single track + +#### What would you do differently? + +- bad timing with code freeze +- Record sessions so there's a better record +- Red Hat was under-represented, so we should consider East +- Not a lot of decisions were made, how do we do things instead of + just talking about it? +- "Stability is important" but there's not an action item +- Lack of specific focus +- More engagement with the agenda ahead of time + +#### Risks + +- Too little governance +- Conformance from the CNCF +- Stability is not getting worked on +- How do you balance convergence vs. divergence +- We are not getting true customer voice - what user experience is - + get feedback from product. +- We need to make it easier for people who wants to find out what + Kubernetes is about + +### Conclusions + +#### Key Takeaways / Analysis of Situation + +#### Recommendations & Decisions Moving Forward (High-Level) + +Specific Action Items (& Owners) + + Action Item Owner(s) + --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- + Read-only on SIG-Leads list instead of closed SIG Cloud SIG Leads mailing list + Proposal for how we recognize contributions Quinton Hoole + Need a SIG owner on utilities Tim Hockin + Ladders Kris N + Regular community check-ins Brian Grant + Describe the end state and then assign breakout work to SIGs. Working group needs to be organized Brian Grant + Working group organization or a SIG that oversees this Machinery CLI Cluster Lifecycle + +SIG Meetings\ +\* Intro \* Pair mentors \* Find out what people want to do \* Off weeks +for office hours \* find out what people want to do \* don't put mission +critical work on new contribs \* watch time zones \* keep SIG meeting as +status, focus on 1:1 for works + +SIG User Onboarding \* education \* 1:1s \* welcome wagon \* Cluster Ops +working on this for operators + +Communicate stability decision User support rotation as a way of getting +real-world feedback + +[Link to original +doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I4abWaWP9qa2XV8Q8b7ENxIby-EvsyXRrt90SS19Ldc/edit?usp=sharing) |
