summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authork8s-ci-robot <k8s-ci-robot@users.noreply.github.com>2018-11-17 07:35:04 -0800
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2018-11-17 07:35:04 -0800
commitc4e87a2524c331f338912595daa50406bc9973c9 (patch)
treefd99934b4a213d181a1ca45a455081816e460836
parent5060a2e50c8cbe052dff5cdd0bfb48334be39b07 (diff)
parent72b2d4386c442311a183fee4230fe58bdee84ea8 (diff)
Merge pull request #2947 from JoeWrightss/patch-1
fixs typo: dont -> don't
-rw-r--r--contributors/design-proposals/apps/deployment.md2
-rw-r--r--contributors/design-proposals/node/node-usernamespace-remapping.md2
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/contributors/design-proposals/apps/deployment.md b/contributors/design-proposals/apps/deployment.md
index 81ef5e66..3f757144 100644
--- a/contributors/design-proposals/apps/deployment.md
+++ b/contributors/design-proposals/apps/deployment.md
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ For each creation or update for a Deployment, it will:
is the one that the new RS uses and collisionCount is a counter in the DeploymentStatus
that increments every time a [hash collision](#hashing-collisions) happens (hash
collisions should be rare with fnv).
- - If the RSs and pods dont already have this label and selector:
+ - If the RSs and pods don't already have this label and selector:
- We will first add this to RS.PodTemplateSpec.Metadata.Labels for all RSs to
ensure that all new pods that they create will have this label.
- Then we will add this label to their existing pods
diff --git a/contributors/design-proposals/node/node-usernamespace-remapping.md b/contributors/design-proposals/node/node-usernamespace-remapping.md
index 75cb0888..37f22836 100644
--- a/contributors/design-proposals/node/node-usernamespace-remapping.md
+++ b/contributors/design-proposals/node/node-usernamespace-remapping.md
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ Docker API does not provide user-namespace mapping. Therefore to handle `GetRunt
## Future Work
### Namespace-Level/Pod-Level user-namespace support
There is no runtime today which supports creating containers with a specified user namespace configuration. For example here is the discussion related to this support in Docker https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/28593
-Once user-namespace feature in the runtimes has evolved to support container’s request for a specific user-namespace mapping(UID and GID range), we can extend current Node-Level user-namespace support in Kubernetes to support Namespace-level isolation(or if desired even pod-level isolation) by dividing and allocating learned mapping from runtime among Kubernetes namespaces (or pods, if desired). From end-user UI perspective, we dont expect any change in the UI related to user namespaces support.
+Once user-namespace feature in the runtimes has evolved to support container’s request for a specific user-namespace mapping(UID and GID range), we can extend current Node-Level user-namespace support in Kubernetes to support Namespace-level isolation(or if desired even pod-level isolation) by dividing and allocating learned mapping from runtime among Kubernetes namespaces (or pods, if desired). From end-user UI perspective, we don't expect any change in the UI related to user namespaces support.
### Remote Volumes
Remote Volumes support should be investigated and should be targeted in future once support is there at lower infra layers.