summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarcin Owsiany <porridge@google.com>2017-11-15 14:11:47 +0100
committerMarcin Owsiany <porridge@google.com>2017-11-15 14:11:47 +0100
commitbcaad8a2f3a2f734e2b97d12f84bb04ee82fbe8b (patch)
treed7f172efdd6d359eadfff587d39f0bfee007119c
parent060c2c72f7b1b05b4d704d8d412e39227885852a (diff)
Some minor wording fixes.
-rw-r--r--contributors/devel/release/scalability-validation.md6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/contributors/devel/release/scalability-validation.md b/contributors/devel/release/scalability-validation.md
index 6653889f..5aae1cbd 100644
--- a/contributors/devel/release/scalability-validation.md
+++ b/contributors/devel/release/scalability-validation.md
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ In this document, we address the following process-related problems wrt scale te
## Non-Goals
-We do not intend to:
+This document does not intend to:
- Define the set of tests that comprise scalability and correctness suite
- Define SLIs/SLOs (that’s discussed [here]) and thresholds for the tests
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ We need to run them on 5k-node clusters, but they’re:
- Expensive (tens of thousands of core hours per run)
- Blocking other large tests (quota limitations + only one large test project available viz. 'kubernetes-scale')
-So we don’t want to run them too frequently. On the other hand, running them too infrequently means late identification and piling up of regressions. So we choose the following middleground:
+So we don’t want to run them too frequently. On the other hand, running them too infrequently means late identification and piling up of regressions. So we choose the following middleground:
(B = release-blocking, NB = not release-blocking)
- Performance tests on 2k-node cluster in GCE/GKE alternatingly each week (NB)
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ Google is currently using a single project for scalability testing, on both GCE
### Concretely define test configuration
-This is a relatively minor issue but it is important that we clearly define the test configuration we use for the release. E.g. there was a confusion this time around testing k8s services, machine-type and no. of the nodes we used (we tested 4k instead of 5k due to a CIDR-setup problem). For ref - [#47344] [#47865]. To solve this, we need to document it using the below template in a file named scalability-validation-report.md placed under kubernetes/features/release-<N>. And this file should be linked from under the scalability section in the release's CHANGELOG.md.
+This is a relatively minor issue but it is important that we clearly define the test configuration we use for the release. E.g. there was a confusion this time around testing k8s services, machine-type and no. of the nodes we used (we tested 4k instead of 5k due to a CIDR-setup problem). For ref - [#47344] [#47865]. To solve this, we need to document it using the below template in a file named scalability-validation-report.md placed under kubernetes/features/release-&gt;N&lt;. And this file should be linked from under the scalability section in the release's CHANGELOG.md.
```
Validated large cluster performance under the following configuration: