adding question

and answer after slack discussion 5/7

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/sig-security/security-audit-2021/RFP.md b/sig-security/security-audit-2021/RFP.md
index bc5346f7..14ee309c 100644
--- a/sig-security/security-audit-2021/RFP.md
+++ b/sig-security/security-audit-2021/RFP.md
@@ -121,3 +121,9 @@ The audit should result in the following deliverables, which will be made public
 * Audited reference architecture specification. Should take the form of a summary and associated configuration YAML files.
 * Findings report including an executive summary.
 * Where possible and, in the vendor’s opinion makes the most judicious use of time, proof of concept exploits that the Kubernetes project can use to investigate and fix defects.
+
+## Questions Asked during RFP Response Process
+
+### Do we need to use our own hardware and infrastructure or should we use a cloud?
+
+Strong preference would be for the vendor to provide their own infrastructure or use a public cloud provider, just NOT a managed offering like GKE or EKS. The reasoning is to prevent accidentally auditing a cloud provider's kubernetes service instead of kubernetes/kubernetes. Depending on the scope and approach, it may make sense to use a local cluster (e.g. kind) for API fuzzing and anything that doesn't impact the underlying OS, and is an easy to use repeatable setup (see Methodology above).