diff options
| author | Jimmy Cuadra <jimmy@jimmycuadra.com> | 2016-10-27 23:16:31 -1000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jimmy Cuadra <jimmy@jimmycuadra.com> | 2016-11-05 00:17:28 -0700 |
| commit | a3c7bf92a2008f246fa9ef82cda15b1b6c097082 (patch) | |
| tree | 854b394030c0706306b3afa5a2f048516d39cf43 | |
| parent | 298af40419483ae8ff6b8b69dd3d875ed1c1687e (diff) | |
Rename PetSet to StatefulSet in docs and examples.
| -rw-r--r-- | indexed-job.md | 24 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/indexed-job.md b/indexed-job.md index 13bf154e..5a089c22 100644 --- a/indexed-job.md +++ b/indexed-job.md @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ The multiple substitution approach: for very large jobs, the work-queue style or another type of controller, such as map-reduce or spark, may be a better fit.) - Drawback: is a form of server-side templating, which we want in Kubernetes but -have not fully designed (see the [PetSets proposal](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/18016/files?short_path=61f4179#diff-61f41798f4bced6e42e45731c1494cee)). +have not fully designed (see the [StatefulSets proposal](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/18016/files?short_path=61f4179#diff-61f41798f4bced6e42e45731c1494cee)). The index-only approach: @@ -874,24 +874,24 @@ admission time; it will need to understand indexes. previous container failures. - modify the job template, affecting all indexes. -#### Comparison to PetSets +#### Comparison to StatefulSets (previously named PetSets) -The *Index substitution-only* option corresponds roughly to PetSet Proposal 1b. -The `perCompletionArgs` approach is similar to PetSet Proposal 1e, but more +The *Index substitution-only* option corresponds roughly to StatefulSet Proposal 1b. +The `perCompletionArgs` approach is similar to StatefulSet Proposal 1e, but more restrictive and thus less verbose. -It would be easier for users if Indexed Job and PetSet are similar where -possible. However, PetSet differs in several key respects: +It would be easier for users if Indexed Job and StatefulSet are similar where +possible. However, StatefulSet differs in several key respects: -- PetSet is for ones to tens of instances. Indexed job should work with tens of +- StatefulSet is for ones to tens of instances. Indexed job should work with tens of thousands of instances. -- When you have few instances, you may want to given them pet names. When you -have many instances, you that many instances, integer indexes make more sense. +- When you have few instances, you may want to give them names. When you have many instances, +integer indexes make more sense. - When you have thousands of instances, storing the work-list in the JobSpec -is verbose. For PetSet, this is less of a problem. -- PetSets (apparently) need to differ in more fields than indexed Jobs. +is verbose. For StatefulSet, this is less of a problem. +- StatefulSets (apparently) need to differ in more fields than indexed Jobs. -This differs from PetSet in that PetSet uses names and not indexes. PetSet is +This differs from StatefulSet in that StatefulSet uses names and not indexes. StatefulSet is intended to support ones to tens of things. |
