summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBrian Grant <bgrant0607@users.noreply.github.com>2017-08-11 09:24:20 -0700
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2017-08-11 09:24:20 -0700
commit8294c8fdaf992b554b512c389c35240bc90ff5c0 (patch)
tree434f99def11ca3feea323067392f3088f8e80d1e
parentc781ea752d3ab3a2f483004675aacdf70d9abf57 (diff)
Added relevant items from #402
-rw-r--r--committee-steering/backlog.md7
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/committee-steering/backlog.md b/committee-steering/backlog.md
index 0a07bd77..ffeff18b 100644
--- a/committee-steering/backlog.md
+++ b/committee-steering/backlog.md
@@ -19,16 +19,21 @@ This is a backlog of items that the steering committee needs to either handle or
of authority/leadership are selected/granted, how decisions are made, and how conflicts are resolved
- Formalize the concept of subprojects
- Decide how/whether ecosystem subprojects (e.g., kops, helm) are governed differently
+- In particular, develop policies/procedures for donated code (e.g., helm, kubernetes-anywhere, kompose, kargo)
- Resolve the disconnect between code organization (OWNERS, maintainers) and people organization (SIGs)
- Simplify the contributor ladder
- Update incubator process to explain new GitHub organization strategy
- Explicitly delegate areas to SIGs
- Escalation process
- Fund-requesting and budget processes
-- Committee decision-making process (e.g., modified lazy consensus) and quorum requirement
+- Committee decision-making process (e.g., modified lazy consensus seeking) and quorum requirement
- Improve/expand definition of members of standing
- Identify who is responsible for evolving the governance going forward and how changes will be approved
- Do we need user groups?
- Do we need insurance?
- Do we need a policy similar to [Apache's release policy](http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html)?
- Update project values
+- Do we need a Conflict of Interest policy?
+- Develop processes to address staffing gaps (engineering, docs, test, release, ...), effort gaps
+ (tragedy of the commons), expertise mismatches, priority conflicts, personnel conflicts
+-