Added rules clarification on who is eligible to be nominated for a community award.

Signed-off-by: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/events/awards/playbook.md b/events/awards/playbook.md
index 7052661a..bb2d59b3 100644
--- a/events/awards/playbook.md
+++ b/events/awards/playbook.md
@@ -27,9 +27,10 @@ Here are a few suggestions or ideas that make for a good award nominee:
   - Awards are affiliation-free and earned by individuals, we do not mention vendors at all as part of this process
   - Vendors are encouraged to celebrate individuals via their own social properties, the awards themselves will remain neutral
 - Spread the Wealth
-   - Should consider lookin at underserved areas of the project
+   - Should consider looking at underserved areas of the project
    - For every "rock star" there's probably a few people quietly doing excellent work.
    - Should consider past awards, having the same person winning the award repeatedly shouldn't be the norm. 
+   - As a rule, current SIG Leads, SC members, and other titled community leaders should be considered ineligible for the contributor awards, as their achievements are already recognized.
 
 ## Process
 
@@ -103,4 +104,4 @@ There may be cases where the ceremony is separate or virtual, here are some tips
 - Virtual Contributor Summits
   - Usually a picture of the award is sufficient and then drop ship the rest.
 - Awardees should be made aware of logistics
-  - The awards are given during the time right up to the end of year holidays, shipping after the holidays is usually easier, awardees should be given a general idea of when the award ships.
\ No newline at end of file
+  - The awards are given during the time right up to the end of year holidays, shipping after the holidays is usually easier, awardees should be given a general idea of when the award ships.