Create 1500-1545_COMMUNITY_LADDER 1500-1545_COMMUNITY_LADDER.md

from Leadership Summit

1 files changed, 75 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/community/2017-events/05-leadership-summit/session-notes/ 1500-1545_COMMUNITY_LADDER 1500-1545_COMMUNITY_LADDER.md b/community/2017-events/05-leadership-summit/session-notes/ 1500-1545_COMMUNITY_LADDER 1500-1545_COMMUNITY_LADDER.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0fe9c1c4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/community/2017-events/05-leadership-summit/session-notes/ 1500-1545_COMMUNITY_LADDER 1500-1545_COMMUNITY_LADDER.md
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+# Community Building & Ladder Session
+
+_Original Title: “Building community effectiveness (Contributor ladder, Code of Conduct & Committee)”_
+
+* Session Area: Community
+* Topic Facilitator(s): Sarah Navatony
+* Note-taker(s) (Collaborating on this doc): 
+  * Rob Hirschfeld @zehicle
+  * Jess Frazzelle 
+* Person responsible for converting to Markdown & uploading to Github: Rob Hirschfeld @zehicle
+
+## Session Notes
+
+Classes of Communities being discussed:
+* Developer / User - using the API
+* Developer / Operator - running the Infrastructure / DevOps
+* Developer / Contributor - writing the Kubernetes code, docs, any sort of non-technical contribution
+
+Topics/Conversation Thread:
+
+* Luke: How to get more people writing code in a sig, encourage new contributors to start contributing
+  * How sig leads can do a better job of encouraging contributors
+  * Defining contributions outside of code, people who plan face to faces, things that help build the community but are not necessarily limited to code
+* Bob: contrib was declared dead, but if you are doing dev work in the community it is not clear where to put ideas out there for feedback
+  * Incubation bar is super high
+  * Things bigger than features, tools, etc
+* Michael: talking about getting people involved without creating schedule risk
+  * There is a spreadsheet that people are using to track priorities of tasks
+  * Need to watch Shepherding bandwidth
+* Sarah suggested that we need to make sure that reviewers are tagged as mentors also
+  * Helps people know who to ask for help, so they don’t stall
+* Kris: it helps to get people to self-identify people’s interests in contributing
+* Michael: use SIG meetings for status and encourage people to connect outside of meetings
+* Jess: Suggested making sure to bring people in with an open item
+  * It helps to make introductions at the start of the meeting
+* Kris - Bob: Office hours?  Alternate weeks for the SIG
+* Michael: Make sure to create a safe space - admit mistakes to be more inclusive
+* Luke: there are a lot of people who are listening but not taking on work
+
+_Group discussed ways to get people to move into activity contributors_
+
+* Sarah: hiring Community Manager role - first job will be to create a mentor pairing program
+* Michael: challenge is that companies want their people to be counted as contributors.
+  * Discussion: this results in gamification and people not being able to participate
+  * There’s some organization learning
+  * We need to be aware of the conflicts
+* Rob brought up that there are people entering the community who are not doing things that capture work that’s passive or just using
+  * Bob described a similar issue w/ Scale where the value is creating data and running tests
+* Contributor ladder needs to include people who are using / operating without making code or docs contributions.  We want to capture their experience and welcome
+* Jess - could even use twitter activity and collect survey results
+* Rob - it can be a very good thing to have a large passive audience
+  * Sarah - as long as there is enough people doing contribution
+  * Rob suggested that we may want user/operator SIGs that act as onboarding and then direct people to more specific SIGs
+
+## Conclusions
+Key Takeaways / Analysis of Situation
+
+* SIGs have a lot of passive participants.  - **This may be OK**
+* We discussed ways to get passive users more engaged including 
+  * introductions at start of meetings
+  * mentor pairings for new 
+  * asking them about area of interest
+  * Pairing people for out-of-meeting 1x1 based on time zones
+  * Keep SIG meeting as status and drive out-of-meeting action
+* There is a problem when companies reward people only on contributions of specific types or projects
+
+## Recommendations & Decisions Moving Forward (High-Level)
+
+* Create a User SIG for onboarding new users and directing them into other SIGs.  This would effectively be an ongoing 101
+* Restart Cluster Ops SIG storytelling for operators and write them down
+* SIGs to use off-weeks for office hours
+
+## Specific Action Items (& Owners)
+
+None Taken